AAP Grand Rounds Subscribe to Pediatrics in Review
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow E-mail this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My File Cabinet
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ackerman, N., Jr.
Related Collections
Right arrow Computers and Other Technologies
Right arrow Perinatal Practice

AAP Grand Rounds 2:4-5 (1999)
© 1999 American Academy of Pediatrics

COMPUTER AND OTHER TECHNOLOGIES

Physiologic Trend Monitoring—Does it Compute?

Source: Cunningham S, Deere S, Symom A, Elton RA, McIntosh N. A randomized, controlled trial of computerized physiologic trend monitoring in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:2053–2060.

The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below.

Cunningham and colleagues conducted a randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of computerized physiologic trend data (HR, RR, pO2, Transcutaneous pCO2, BP, MAP, CVP, core and peripheral temperature and O2 sat) on short-, medium-, and long-term variables in a Level III NICU. Four groups of infants in Edinburgh, Scotland, who were <32 weeks gestation or 32 weeks gestation and ventilated for 4 hours or asphyxiated were studied: (a) no display of trend data (n = 215), (b) continuous display of trend data (n = 230), (c) alternating 24-hr display of trend data starting in first 24 hours (n = 76), and (d) alternating 24-hr display of trend data with no display for first 24-hrs (n = 79). Staff acceptance of the new monitoring system . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Neel Ackerman, Jr., MD, FAAP
Neonatology, MAGELLA Medical Association PA, Dallas, TX

 






HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS CME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.